| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
0
   |
Posted - 2012.05.28 06:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Cloned S0ul wrote:Here two type of people who pvp, a true warriors who fight vs combat ships druing war dec, or on low sec, or null space, second type a carebear who think they badass because he can kill other careberars who using miningbarges, also no balzz ******* bunch of idiots who fell mighty while destroying poor mining barge, even no profit form kiling them only empty killmails statistic with some value but infact 0 profit. Some people say, we do it for lulz but this is bulshit, here no fun at all while kiling carebear who blow in 5sec to two destroyers. posts like this make it worth all the while even if it was totally unprofitable
ah but isnt that CCP's definition of actionable ganking? |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Ituhata Saken wrote:Rhah Kaundur wrote:Bring an alt or friend to the belt with you in a very cheap frigate. Attack your own Hulk so that concord responds. The concord ships should hang around with you for awhile. That should give you a nice little escort fleet while you mine. If concord leaves..do it again. Old trick, and I love the ingenuity of it, but I thought that was deemed an exploit at one time? It is.
Its also suggested by Mittens in the Goonswarm Shrugged thread
Google it. Its a good read |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:baltec1 wrote:Good luck making any kind of profit on that kill. Dude, I don't know you, or where your coming from, but really, you sound as bad as any hi-sec carebear with your "profit"/"loss" statements... If i were to start ganking again, isk would be a secondary concern. Good for you. Just about everyone else who ganks however do it for the isk.
Well they say they do it for that cause CCP's definition if griefing depends on you getting a profit from it and "for the lulz" could net you as the first person to ever get banned for griefing |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:According to CCP and the GMs that we as a corp and alliance have been told when we did our ice interdictions, spawning CONCORD in a belt to be bodyguards is a missuse of the mechanic and seen as an exploit. Anyone caught doing this will get a warning and further missuse will result in a temp ban. Anyone doing this should be reported to a GM. What you are thinking about is not biomassing a ganking alt to avoid having to grind up sec status.
which is only a exploit if the reporting person can prove it which is nigh impossible to do. Why the hell this is even a exploit when random person getting ganked can never porove it happened is unknown to me |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:EVE Roy Mustang wrote:
Its also suggested by Mittens in the Goonswarm Shrugged thread
Google it. Its a good read
Wrong again. That was undocking in an ibis after a gank to drag concord away from a belt which is a legit tactic.
Interesting how its legal for the gankers to kite them but not the defenders
|
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 03:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:EVE Roy Mustang wrote:baltec1 wrote:EVE Roy Mustang wrote:
Its also suggested by Mittens in the Goonswarm Shrugged thread
Google it. Its a good read
Wrong again. That was undocking in an ibis after a gank to drag concord away from a belt which is a legit tactic. Interesting how its legal for the gankers to kite them but not the defenders The difference is we were not using CONCORD for protection just moving them about system. Thats the difference. It is also very easy to prove someone is spawing concord for protection because the logs show the same ibis getting killed over and over by concord in the same system.
yes the difference is theyre moving them out of the system so they have to re-warp to get there, taking time to get there again. AGAIN. Its funny its ok for the aggressors to kite concord but not the defenders
|
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 03:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:baltec1 wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:baltec1 wrote:Good luck making any kind of profit on that kill. Dude, I don't know you, or where your coming from, but really, you sound as bad as any hi-sec carebear with your "profit"/"loss" statements... If i were to start ganking again, isk would be a secondary concern. Good for you. Just about everyone else who ganks however do it for the isk. I don't believe that. However, I will believe that isk motivates the weekend warriors/carebears...
they have to pretend they do it for the isk. Ive seen where CCP defines griefing ny doing it for a non monetary reason.
If they actually said they do it for the lulz they might be the first ever ppl to get banned for griefing. |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 14:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ludi Burek wrote:
6.) Demanding that one play style is wrong and it should be curbed goes directly against the concept of the sandbox.
ah, like James 315 and the gankers are DOING to the miners? Glad you agree with the miners then.
RubyPorto wrote:wiskyjack wrote:It's simple, just think of eve as being like WW II
Jesus...
no... WWII, youre thinking too far back |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 14:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ten Bulls wrote:Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield. No, they don't.
really... post the build that gets max defense and max yield at the same time tippia, Im calling you on that BS |
EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy
Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 20:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
I still like my idea. low sec status you get podded.
Real consequences for your actions. Unless of course that consequences thing is just another bs smoke screen like "we dont care about insurance" (given the QQ that came after the insurance nerf and how ppl are convinced that CCP are caving to the carebears over it shows THAT lie) |
| |
|